한국어 어음청각검사의 개발과 표준화에 대한 고찰 |
한우재1, 방정화2 |
1한림대학교 자연과학대학 언어청각학부, 청각언어연구소 2한림국제대학원대학교 청각학과 |
A Review of Development and Standardization on
Korean Speech Audiometry |
Woojae Han1, Jungwha Bahng2 |
1Division of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Research Institute of Audiology and Speech Pathology, College of Natural Sciences, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea 2Department of Audiology, Hallym University of Graduate Studies, Seoul, Korea |
Correspondence |
Jungwha Bahng ,Tel: (070) 8680-6933, Fax: (02) 3451-6618, Email: bahng.jh@gmail.com
|
|
Received: November 30, 2013; Accepted: December 5, 2013. Published online: December 31, 2013. |
|
|
ABSTRACT |
It is well known that assessment of speech perception is one of essential elements in audiology including its
research and clinical practices. Numerous researchers have attempted to develop and evaluate the speech perception
assessment materials in order to give appropriate intervention and better treatment to hearing-impaired listeners. One
of primary goals of this paper is to review the Korean Speech Audiometry (KSA) (Lee et al., 2010) in terms of its
development and standardization, and thus to increase awareness among professionals about its strengths and
weakness related to the assessment of speech perception performance in adults and children with normal hearing and
those with hearing loss. This paper includes reviews of three speech perception tests, e.g., Word Recognition Score
(WRS), Speech Recognition Threshold (SRT), and Sentences Recognition Score (SRS), which have a small set of
experiments and outputs based on two requirements of the speech perception assessment, called validity and
reliability. The WRS showed an inter-list difference up to 20% in 25 subjects with moderate sensorineural hearing
loss even if there was no significant difference statistically among lists. In SRT, there were spondees having unequal
sound pressure levels and several tense (or fortis) sounds in the lists. Lists of the SRS showed a ceiling effect in
either the normal hearing or the hearing-impaired listeners in spite of a good validity. The authors expect that
audiologists will have a new insight and intuition on the speech perception tests after reading this review paper.
Also, the authors ask the audiologists to know that developing and evaluating the KSA is an on-going process and
it will continue to be developed in the future. |
Key Words:
Korean speech audiometry (KSA), Word recognition scores (WRS), Monosyllabic words, Speech
recognition threshold (SRT), Bisyllabic words, Spondee, Sentence recognition scores (SRS) |
|
|
|