개인청각보호장구의 청각역치차이와 어음명료도지수 |
최철희1,2,3 |
1대구가톨릭대학교 언어청각치료학과 2생체모방감각제어연구소 3가톨릭 청각음성언어센터 |
Hearing Threshold Shift and Speech Intelligibility Index of Personal Hearing
Protective Devices |
Chul-Hee Choi1,2,3 |
1Department of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, College of Medical Sciences, Catholic University of Daegu, Kyung-Buk, Korea 2Research Institute of Biomimetic Sensory Control, Catholic University of Daegu, Kyung-Buk, Korea 3Catholic Hearing Voice Speech Center, Catholic University of Daegu, Kyung-Buk, Korea |
Correspondence |
Chul-Hee Choi ,Tel: 82-53-850-2541, Fax: 82-53-850-2540, Email: cchoi@cu.ac.kr
|
|
Received: April 30, 2013; Revised: June 18, 2013 Accepted: June 19, 2013. Published online: June 30, 2013. |
|
|
ABSTRACT |
The objective of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of the personal hearing protective devices in terms of the hearing
threshold shift and the speech intelligibility index. The hearing threshold shift was used to quantify the protection effect of the
personal hearing protective devices and obtained by subtracting the baseline threshold measured without the personal hearing
protective devices from the hearing threshold measured with the personal hearing protective devices. The speech intelligibility index
(SII) was used to predict and compare the potential benefits of each personal hearing protective device and obtained from the
count-the dots method. A total of 6 college students aging from 21 to 25 years old were randomly recruited as subjects. Different
types of personal hearing protective devices (earplug and earmuff) were used in this study. A statistically significant difference
between the mean amount of threshold shift at low frequency (0.25-1 kHz) and that of high frequency region (2-8 kHz) was observed.
The personal hearing protective devices (earplug and earmuff) were effective in protecting hearing from high frequency noises than
low frequency noises. The use of earmuff was effective at the low frequency region while the use of earplug was effective at the high
frequency region. In addition, the use of the earplug was more effective for the SII than that of the earmuff. The protection amount of
the personal hearing protective devices (earplug and earmuff) ranged from 23 to 38 dB. However, the SII ranged from 32.6 to 54.5%,
which indicates that the subjects misunderstood or missed the speech information ranged from 45.5 to 67.4% as mild to moderate
hearing loss. This may lead to the development of new personal hearing protective devices which are effective for protecting hearing
and understanding speech. |
Key Words:
Personal hearing protective devices, Earplug, Earmuff, Hearing threshold shift, Speech intelligibility index,
Noise-induced hearing loss, Acute acoustic trauma |
|
|
|